Disposed
Anil Kumar Ahuja v. Arun Kumar Ahuja & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/3426/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 3426 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.4.2009
Anil Kumar Ahuja
... .Petitioner
Versus
Arun Kumar Ahuja and others
... Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Ms. Stuti Kohli, Advocate for Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. R.K Dogra, Advocate for the respondents.
RAJESH BINDAL J
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petition filed before the Learned District Judge, Chandigarh is already abated as is noticed in the order passed by learned Additional District Judge, on March 6, 2009.
Dismissed as infructuous.
20.4.2009
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
Anil Kumar Ahuja
Arun Kumar Ahuja
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court