The petition titled Anuriti Taneja and others vs. Anil Kumar Ahuja and others was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying petition before the Learned District Judge, Chandigarh, was already abated by an order passed on March 6, 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 20.4.2009
Anuriti Taneja and others
... .Petitioners
Versus
Anil Kumar Ahuja and others
... Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:Mr. R.K Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Stuti Kohli, Advocate for Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1.
RAJESH BINDAL J
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petition filed before the Learned District Judge, Chandigarh is already abated as is noticed in the order passed by learned Additional District Judge, on March 6, 2009.
Dismissed as infructuous.
20.4.2009
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Reema
Anuriti Taneja and others
Anil Kumar Ahuja and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
