State of Punjab v. Gurmail Singh & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh. RFA…
and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh. RFA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh.
RFA No. 1602 of 1988 Decided on August 08,2008.
State of Punjab and another ---Appellants
vs.
Gurmail Singh and others ---Respondents.
Present: Mr.Manohar Lall,Addl.A.G.Punjab, for the appellants None for the respondent.
Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:
Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short,'the Act'), was issued on 24.6.1981, vide which land in village Shamsher Nagar for construction of Southern Bye Pass G.T.Road Shamsher Nagar adjoining Sirhind Chuni Road, was acquired.
The land owners were compensated by the Collector vide his award dated 24.4.1985, assessing the compensation @ Rs.25,000/- per acre. Unsatisfied with the award, objections under Section 18 of the Act, were filed by the landowners to the Collector, which were referred to the District Judge, Patiala, who vide his award dated 28.4.1988 reassessed the compensation for the entire land @ Rs. 50,000/- per acre.
The State of Punjab, had filed RFA No.1606 of 1988 (State of Punjab and another v. Piara Singh) which was decided on 29.10.2003 by
RFA No.1602 of 1988
-2-
Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.K.Bali. The present controversy is covered by the decision rendered in the above referred RFA No.1606 of 1988.
The present appeal is,therefore, disposed of in the same terms
as in RFA No.1606 of 1988 decided on 29.10.2003.
August 08,2008 RR
(Rakesh Kumar Jain) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Punjab and another v. Piara SinghReferred¶10
RFA No.1606 of 1988
State of Punjab
Gurmail Singh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court