Vikram Arora Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to make the payment of works executed by the petitioner alongwith interest @ 18% per annum.

¶15

For the relief claimed in the instant petition, the petitioner has already sent a legal notice dated 12.2.2008 (P-1) to the respondents to which no reply is stated to have been received.

¶16

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the paper book. It is well settled that before seeking a direction or a writ of mandamus, a demand justice notice is required to be served on the respondents as has been done in the present case. Therefore, without going into the merits of the

¶17

CWP No. 7565 of 2008

¶18

-2-

¶19

case, we dispose of the writ petition at this stage with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the legal notice dated 12.2.2008 (P-1) sent by the petitioner by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶20

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶21

(M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE

¶22

May 07, 2008 anita

¶23

(SABINA) JUDGE

Vikram Arora v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Arora v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navtej Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Haryanaand Others

Mangat Rai Chawla Vs P.S.E.B. and Ors.

Ranjit Singh Vs D C Rupnagar and Ors.

Mehar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Harbhej Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.