The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after it was informed that the petitioner had been reposted, rendering the petition no longer maintainable.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CASE NO.: CWP No.1678 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION: October 16, 2008
JOGINDER SINGH
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA.
PRESENT: MR. DEEPAK SIBAL, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. KAPIL KAKKAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 & 2.
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL)
Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 states that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been posted back at Gurdaspur vide order dated 30.4.2008.
In view of the statement made by Sh.Kakkar, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE
October 16, 2008 (RAJAN GUPTA) Gulati JUDGE
Joginder Singh
Punjab State Electricity Board
Ashutosh Mohunta
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
