The Single Judge dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition after it was represented that the respondents had no apprehension against the petitioners, noting the petitioners' marriage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-17005 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 12, 2008
Ramanpreet Kaur & Another
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. N.S. Diwana, Advocate, for Mr. Narinder Lucky, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 7.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7 has assured the Court that the petitioners need not have any apprehension of threat from the respondents. The respondents Nos.5 to 7 althrough were under the impression that petitioner No.1 has gone to Australia. It is only when notice of the petition was received that they have come to know that she has married to petitioner No.2.
In view of the above, no further order needs to be passed.
Disposed of.
(AJAI LAMBA) August 12, 2008 JUDGE
Crl. Misc. No. M- of 2008 [2]
avin
Ramanpreet Kaur & Another
State of Punjab & Others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
