This Court held that the present civil writ petition has become infructuous due to the efflux of time and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP NO.781 of 1998
DATE OF DECISION: December 5, 2006
Sushmita Keerthi
….Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA
PRESENT: Shri Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Shri Tarun Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).
It appears from the relief claimed by the present petitioner that the petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Viney Mittal) Judge
December 5, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge
Sushmita Keerthi
State of Punjab
Viney Mittal
H.S. Bhalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
