The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, granting liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with better particulars.
Liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP NO.7076 of 2004
DATE OF DECISION:December 5, 2006
Parveen Kumar
….Petitioner
VERSUS
Union of India and others
Respondents
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA
PRESENT: Shri Atul Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri Amit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.4.
Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by giving better particulars and by making additional challenges.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as aforesaid.
(Viney Mittal) Judge
December 5, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge
Parveen Kumar
Union of India
Viney Mittal
H.S. Bhalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
