Sukhwant Kaur v. State of Punjab and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph order dismissing a petition due to non-prosecution by the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
None
Single-paragraph order dismissing a petition due to non-prosecution by the petitioner.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.17682-M of 2006
DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 5, 2006
Sukhwant Kaur
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Punjab and another
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab.
On July 7, 2006, August 28, 2006 and September 28, 2006, no
one was present on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, nobody appeared for the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
December 5, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE
Sukhwant Kaur
The State of Punjab
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court