Md. Shams Alam Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7376 of 2026

======================================================

Md. Shams Alam Ansari S/o Md. Farooque Ansari, R/o-Village-Basant urf Bishunpur Umapat, P.O-Rampur Hari, P.S-Aurai, District-Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Education Department Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Secretary, Education Department, Bihar Patna

¶8

The Director, Mass Education cum Addl. Secretary, Education Department, Bihar Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

The District Education Officer, (Literacy) Muzaffarpur.

¶11

The District Program Officer Literacy, Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Block Education Officer Aurai Block, Muzaffarpur.

¶13

The Headmaster, Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya Basant, Aurai-2 Block-Aurai District- Muzaffarpur.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Manoj For the state Mr. Lokesh Kumar, AC to AG

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶21

counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

¶22

With the consent of the parties, this writ application is being disposed of at this stage itself.

¶23

In the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for grant of following relief:-

¶24

“That this application is being filed for issuance appropriate writ/writs by commanding the respondents issue appointment letter of the

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.7376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/3

¶26

petitioner as per the final Merit List dt.22.05.2025 (Annexure-P3 series) in which petitioner is at no.1 and all the formalities were completed on the post of Talimi Markaj Shiksha Swamsevi with all consequential benefit.”

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner while advancing argument submits that for seeking the aforesaid relief, the petitioner has already filed a representation dated 01.04.2026 before the District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6), which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-P-4 and the same continues to be pending. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if an appropriate direction could be issued to the District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6) to dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner within a fixed timeframe, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶28

To the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State does not have any objection.

¶29

Considering the limited nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of, directing the District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6) to dispose of the pending

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.7376 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 3/3

¶31

representation of the petitioner dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure-P4) within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶32

Needless to emphasize that the final order, which shall be passed by District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6), should be a reasoned and speaking order, and in case the petitioner is found entitled to the relief, which the petitioner has claimed through the representation, the same should be extended to the petitioner within a further period of three months from the date of passing of the final order by District Programme Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur (respondent no.6).

¶33

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶34

All pending interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also be deemed to have been disposed of.

¶35

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶36

HR/-

¶37

U

Md. Shams Alam Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shams Alam Ansari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Bilas Karmkar Vs The State of Bihar

Manjit Kumar @ Manjit Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nisat Alam @ Md Nishat Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Das Vs National Institute of Open Schooling

KUmari Sandhya @ Sandhya Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rupa Kumari Vs The State of Bihar