Dismissed¶21

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2026CR. MISC./28667/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, order dated 24-04-2026 by Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh, dismissing a petition (Cr. Misc. No. 28667 of 2026) seeking modification of bail order dated 10.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 4046 of 2024 (PS Case No. 535/2022, Madhubani Complaint Case), where bail carried an undertaking to pay Rs. 4,000/- per month maintenance to opposite party No. 2; petitioner argued she had remarried (opposite party No. 3) on 09/10.03.2026; State opposed, saying matter was for trial stage. Keywords: modification of bail order, maintenance undertaking, remarriage of opposite party during pendency, bail on undertaking, Patna High Court.

What did the court decide?

In view of the facts and circumstances, the order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4046 of 2024 is not required to be modified. ¶21

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28667 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4046 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-535 Year-2022 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar S/o- Umesh Chandra Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Kathalwadi PO- Lalbagh PS- Lalit Narayan Mithila University District-Darbhanga Bihar

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Lalita Devi W/o- Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar/Jay Krish Yadav, D/oKari Yadav R/v- Atri W.No-5, Po- Laukahi Ps- Laukahi Dist- Madhubani

¶11

Jay Krish Yadav S/o- Dhaneshwar Yadav R/v- Hanuman Nagar, Po- Dhabhi Ps- Phulparas Dist- Madhubani

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Apurva Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 24-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶16

This petition has been filed for modification of order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4046 of 2024 whereby petitioner was granted bail on the basis of his undertaking that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 4,000/- (four thousand) per month to the opposite party No. 2.

¶17

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during pendency of the case, opposite party No. 2 has already solemnized marriage with opposite party No. 3 on 09/10.03.2026 and she is residing in her new matrimonial house.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28667 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/2

¶19

Hence, petitioner is not required to continue to pay the maintenance amount to the opposite party No. 2, accordingly, he prays for necessary correction in the aforesaid order.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the petition and submits that it is a matter to be seen at the stage of trial.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, order dated 10.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4046 of 2024 is not required to be modified. This modification petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Navya/-

¶24

U T

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Yadav @ Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bibhishan Rajak @ Ankit Rajak @ Bhavishan Rajak @ Bhivishan Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakah Singh @ Bande Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shivjee Nath Chauhan @ Shivjee Nath Chaudhari Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kamal Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar