the informant is a 28 years old female and she had met the petitioner in a coaching centre whereafter, they entered into a love relationship and they also entered into a physical relationship on the pretext of marriage. It is further submitted that the FIR further discloses that the petitioner stayed at the house of the informant for 15 days and thereafter, they met at different places, where they entered into physical relationship. On such grounds, it has been submitted that this is a case of purely consensual relationship between two adults, which subsequently, could not culminate into a marriage. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is working in the Railways and upon an enquiry conducted by the Railway Department also, no action on the administrative side was taken against him. Learned counsel has further submitted that it would be evident from the case diary that the petitioner and the informant/victim were in touch through mobile phones since long, which substantiates the argument that there was a long standing relationship between them.