Allowed¶19

Vishal Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Criminal Miscellaneous – regular bail

Patna HC18 May 2026CR. MISC./21267/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.21267 of 2026, decided 18-05-2026 by Ansul, J. Vishal Paswan v. The State of Bihar. Regular bail granted in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 851 of 2025 (Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 3(5) B.N.S. and section 27 Arms Act) on the grounds of absence of specific allegation of firing against the named petitioner and period of custody since 29.11.2025; bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; observations prima facie and limited to the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram / concerned court below in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 851 of 2025. ¶19

Vishal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21267 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-851 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vishal Paswan Son of Manoj Paswan @ Manoj Kumar Paswan Resident of Village - Ghtikan, P.S. - Sheosagar, District - Rohtas.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-05-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 851 of 2025, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and section 27 Arms Act.

¶14

As per prosecution case, the allegation is that in a case of group rivalry firing was exchanged between two groups. The petitioner is named in the FIR but there is no specific allegation of firing attributed against him.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2025.

¶16

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposes

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21267 of 2026(3) dt.18-05-2026 2/2

¶18

the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the absence of specific allegation and period of custody, this application is allowed.

¶20

Accordingly, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram /concerned court below in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 851 of 2025.

¶21

It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶22

(Ansul, J)

¶23

Ranjeet/- Nitesh

¶24

U T

Vishal Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushottam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Syed Ahsan Majeed Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Ram @ Bhuar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Sharma @ Rajan Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Akhtar Ansari @ Akatar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar