Disposed¶33

Yugal Kishore Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Apr 2025CWJC/5059/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.5059 of 2025; Patna High Court; Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J; decided 07-04-2025; online Jamabandi Nos. 205116400088065-205116400088068; Annexure P/2; Circle Officer Murliganj; Madhepura; Murliganj; private respondents 10-13 (Chandan, Nitish, Vikash, Rajesh Kumar); Jamabandi No.2222; revenue rent receipt; alternative remedy; interim relief without prejudice; writ petition disposed of; land records Bihar.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted; petitioners permitted to take recourse of the statutory alternative remedy, with the observation that the concerned authority shall consider their prayer for interim relief without being prejudiced by this order. ¶33

Yugal Kishore Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5059 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Yugal Kishore Yadav Son of Late Parchu Yadav, Permanent resident of Kachchi Pakki Road, Mohalla - Atardah, P.S. - Sadar Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶4

Lalit Kishore, Son of Yugal Kishore Yadav, Permanent resident of Kachchi Pakki Road, Mohalla - Atardah, P.S. - Sadar Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Land Records and Survey, Government of Bihar, Shastrinagar, Patna.

¶9

The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division at Saharsa.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

¶11

The Additional Collector, Madhepura.

¶12

The Land Reform Deputy Collector, Madhepura.

¶13

The Block Development Officer (B.D.O) Murliganj, Madhepura.

¶14

The Circle Officer, Murliganj, Madhepura.

¶15

The Executive Engineer, PWD, Madhepura.

¶16

Chandan Kumar, Son of Late Manohar Yadav, Resident of village and P.O. - Rahta, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura.

¶17

Nitish Kumar, Son of Late Manohar Yadav, Resident of village and P.O. - Rahta, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura.

¶18

Vikash Kumar, Son of Late Manohar Yadav, Resident of village and P.O. - Rahta, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura.

¶19

Rajesh Kumar, Son of Late Manohar Yadav, Resident of village and P.O. - Rahta, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura.

¶20

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the State Respondents : Mr. K.P. Gupta- G.P.- 10 Mr. Satya Vrat A.C. to G.P.-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

2 07-04-2025 Heard the parties.

¶23

The present writ petition has been filed by the

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.5059 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/3

¶25

petitioners for following reliefs:-

¶26

(i) For direction to stay on the online JamabandiNo.205116400088065,20511640008806 6, 205116400088067 and 205116400088068 contained in Annexure P/2 opened by the respondent no.8 in favour of private respondent no.10 to.13 in very mechanical manner without given reasonable opportunity to the petitioners and also not considering the right and title of petitioners and current Jamabandi No.2222 under which petitioner continuously paying revenue rent for which Government of Bihar issued rent receipt in name of petitioner despite of ample documentary evidence favour petitioners they deprived from their legal right to property.

¶27

(ii) For direction to the respondent no. 4 to provide reasonable opportunity to petitioners in connection with illegal online Jamabandi No. 205116400088065,205116400088066,2051164000 88067 and 205116400088068 contained in Annexure P/2 opened by the respondent no.8 in favour of respondent no.10 to 13 and further Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct respondent authority to pass appropriate order in accordance with law after considering the right and title of petitioners and current Jamabandi No.2222 under which petitioner continuously paying revenue rent for which Government of Bihar issued rent receipt in name of petitioner no. 1.

¶28

(iii) And for any other reliefs/reliefs for which the petitioners are found to be entitled under the provision of law involved in the present case.

¶29

The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of

¶30

creation of Jamabandi in favour of the private respondents nos. 10 to 13.

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.5059 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 3/3

¶32

The petitioners may take the recourse of alternative remedy provided under the statute and if they take the recourse of alternative remedy, the concerned authority shall consider the petitioners’ prayer for interim relief, without being prejudiced by this order.

¶33

With these observations, the writ petition stands

¶34

disposed of.

¶35

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶36

kundan/-

¶37

Yugal Kishore Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yugal Kishore Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Ranjan @ Gandhi @ Ashish Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Avishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Yasin and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bindeshwar Prasad Yadav @ Bindeshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Madhu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar