Disposed¶28

Kumarjee Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC24 Mar 2025CWJC/17860/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kumarjee Thakur v. State of Bihar; CWJC No. 17860 of 2018; Patna High Court; decided 24-03-2025; Coram: Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. Writ petition seeking mandamus to produce and quash record of Parcha Case No. 1 of 2014-2015 (Khata No. 1859, Khesra No. 1281, Village Raje West, Manigachhi, District Darbhanga) and restraint against interference with possession claimed since 1935; disposed of with liberty to petitioner to seek redressal before appropriate authority; State raised no objection; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited; no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance. ¶28

Kumarjee Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17860 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kumarjee Thakur S/o Late Kapileshwar Thakur, Resident of Village- Raje West, P.O. + P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Collector, Darbhanga, District Darbhanga.

¶8

The Block Development Officer, Manigachhi Block, District- Darbhanga.

The Circle Officer, Manigachhi Block, District- Darbhanga.

¶13

Babloo Ram, Son of Yogi Ram.

¶14

Sita Devi, Wife of Dilip Ram,

¶15

Bishwanath Ram, Son of Mahinder Ram, Respondent Nos. 5, 6, and 7 are residents of Village- Raje West, P.O.+ P.S.- Manigachhi, DistrictDarbhanga.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 24-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

The instant writ petition has been filed for the

¶21

following reliefs:-

¶22

“i. A writ in nature of Mandamus or any other writ or order or direction be issued directing and calling upon respondents to produce record of Parcha Case No. 1 of 20142015 said to be initiated with respect to Khata No. 1859, Khesra No. 1281 situated at VillageRaje West, Manigacchi, District- Darbhanga and after production quash the same.

¶23

ii. A writ in nature of Mandamus or any other writ or order or direction be issued directing and commanding the respondents not

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.17860 of 2018(2) dt.24-03-2025 2/2

¶25

to interfere in peacefully possession of the petitioner since the forefather of petitioner are in possession of aforesaid land since 1935.”

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach before the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance.

¶27

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

¶28

In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for.

¶29

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶30

utkarsh/-

¶31

Kumarjee Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumarjee Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar Keshari Vs The State of Bihar

Istak Ali @ Istak Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Dharamveer Thakur @ Dharamveer Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amlapari Devi @ Fudena Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ishwar Sao and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.