Dismissed¶25

Bhola Prasad v. The Patna Municipal Corporation

Patna HC18 Feb 2025CWJC/15189/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.15189 of 2022, oral order dt. 18-02-2025, Rajiv Roy, J. Petitioners Bhola Prasad and Sunil Kumar challenged Patna Municipal Corporation order (Letter No. 9162 dt. 30.06.2022, Town Commissioner) resuming their land with constructions and directing Estate Officer to take possession within 30 days; also prayed for mutation of names. Dismissed on 24.09.2024 for non-compliance with defect-removal direction of 10.09.2024; file consigned after hearing on 18-02-2025. No merits decision, no statutes or precedents cited, no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

As the order of 10.09.2024 granting two weeks to remove the defects was not complied with, the petition stands dismissed on 24.09.2024; the file was perused and consigned, with no issue on merits adjudicated. ¶25

Bhola Prasad Vs The Patna Municipal Corporation — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15189 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bhola Prasad Son of Nanhak Ray, Resident of Road No. 10D, Rajendra Nagar, Shahpur, Police Station- Kadamkuan, District- Patna.

¶4

Sunil Kumar, Son of Nanhak Ray, Resident of Road No. 10D, Rajendra Nagar, Shahpur, Police Station- Kadamkuan, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Town Commissioner, Mouryalok, Patna.

¶8

The Town Commissioner, Mouryalok, Patna.

¶9

The Estate Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Mouryalok, Patna.

¶10

The Executive Officer, Bankipur Anchal, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

¶11

The Executive Officer, Bankipur, Division P.M.C. Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

=============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ===============	======================================= : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Adv. : Mr.Prasoon Sinha, APP =======================================
CORAM: HONOU	RABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 18-02-2025 Heard the parties.

¶15

The petition has been filed for the following

¶16

reliefs:-

¶17

“ That the present application is

¶18

being preferred on behalf of the Petitioners above named invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court for the following relief (s), direction (s), order (s) :-

¶19

(i) For quashing the order as contained in Letter No. 9162 dated 30.06.2022 passed by the Learned Town Commissioner,

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.15189 of 2022(3) dt.18-02-2025 2/2

¶21

Patna Municipal Corporation, land of the Petitioners with constructions thereon has been resumed and the Estate Official has been directed to take possession of the said property, within 30 days.

¶22

(ii) Also for commanding the respondent authority to mutate the name of the petitioners in question purchased by them through registered Deed of Sale form the descendants.

¶23

(iii) Also for any other appropriate relief(s) as the may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances or in the eyes of law.”.

¶24