Allowed¶23

Jagdev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Dec 2025CR. MISC./71067/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail allowed — Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No.71067 of 2025 (decided 22-12-2025, Sandeep Kumar, J.): two accused related to the principal kidnapper (the petitioners' son) granted bail in Ratanpur PS Case 16/2025, Supaul, charged under Ss. 137(2), 96, 3(5) BNS; custody since 21.04.2025 and 04.05.2025; victim recovered 16.12.2025; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 each plus two like sureties; matter before Special Judge, POCSO Act, Supaul.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Supaul/concerned Court below, in connection with Ratanpur P.S. Case No. 16/2025. ¶23

Jagdev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71067 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jagdev Yadav S/O Late Badar Yadav R/O Village- Lalmanpatti ward no. 5, P.S-Ratanpura, District- Supaul.

¶5

Nand Kishor Yadav S/O Ayodhi Yadav R/O Village- Mirjawa Ward No. 11, P.S- Triveniganj, Distt.- Supaul.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Rita Devi W/O Maheshwari Yadav R/O Village- Lalamanpatti, P.SRatanpura, Distt.- Supaul.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 22-12-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Ratanpur P.S. Case No. 16/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

¶17

3. As per the prosecution case, the victim is alleged to have been kidnapped by the son of the petitioners.

¶18

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 21.04.2025

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71067 of 2025(4) dt.22-12-2025 2/2

¶20

and petitioner no. 2 is in custody since 04.05.2025. The petitioners undertake to co-operate in the case/ trial.

¶21

5. Learned APP for the State submits that he has got instruction from the police that the victim has been recovered on 16.12.2025.

¶22

6. Considering that the main allegation is against the son of the petitioners and the not the petitioners and the period of custody of the petitioners, this application for regular bail is allowed.

¶23

7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Supaul/concerned Court below in connection with Ratanpur P.S. Case No. 16/2025.

¶24

tusharika/-

¶25

U T

¶26

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

Jagdev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdev Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramashankar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anish Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar