Allowed¶22

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Criminal Miscellaneous – regular bail – Arms Act, sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35

Patna HC17 Sept 2025CR. MISC./67426/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.67426 of 2025, decided 17-09-2025 by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey (oral order). Regular bail allowed to Saurabh Kumar @ son of Sadanand Yadav in Rajoun P.S. Case No. 286 of 2025, Thana Rajoun, District Banka, under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act; alleged recovery of one country made loaded pistol; petitioner in custody since 17.07.2025; State cited nine criminal antecedents; bail bond Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties to CJM, Banka. No precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka. ¶22

Saurabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67426 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Saurabh Kumar Son of Sadanand Yadav @ Sadanand Gope Village- Kaitha PS- Rajoun District -Banka

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-09-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made loaded pistol was recovered.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather he has been framed in this case on the basis of his criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67426 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2

¶20

17.07.2025.

¶21

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of nine cases.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 286 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

¶23

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Shubham/-

¶25

U T

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Mahto @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sayem Babu Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Azaz @ Md. Azaj Vs The State of Bihar

Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Anek Kumar @ Ram Anek Rai Vs The State of Bihar