Allowed¶18

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Regular bail

Patna HC16 Sept 2025CR. MISC./46142/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin v. State of Bihar; Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46142 of 2025; decided 16-09-2025; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey; regular bail; sections 64, 62 and 76 B.N.S.; Section 183 B.N.S.S. statement; Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, Nawada; outrage of modesty; compromise between parties; custody since 27.04.2025; bail bond Rs.10,000/- with two sureties; C.J.M. Nawada; APP Binod Kumar; counsel Pramod Kumar Verma.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be released on bail in Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada. ¶18

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46142 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin Son of Prabhu Ravidas Resident of Kaithawan, P.S.- Sirari, District - Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 16-09-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 64, 62 and 76 of B.N.S.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner attempted to outrage the modesty of the informant.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the during investigation, the victim has given her statement recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S. wherein she has developed the story and stated that the petitioner has established forceful physical relationship with her. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46142 of 2025(3) dt.16-09-2025 2/2

¶16

further submitted that due to intervention of the well-wishers, parties have compromised the case. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 27.04.2025.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada.

¶19

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶20

Shubham/-

¶21

U T

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivam Kumar @ Sachin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamsad Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Hariom Kumar @ Hariom Ji Vs The State of Bihar

Neeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Mahto @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sayem Babu Vs The State of Bihar

Saurabh Singh @ Saurabh Raj Vs The State of Bihar