Rajeshwar Kumar @ Raju Singh Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61825 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- BALIGAON District- Vaishali

======================================================

Rajeshwar Kumar @ Raju Singh, S/o Dinesh Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Baligoan, P.S-Baligoan, Dist.- Vaishali, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-09-2025

¶11

Heard Mrs. Archana Sinha, learned senior counsel for

¶12

the petitioner, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 76, 126(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

¶14

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with kudal on the head of the informant but she saved herself anyhow. It is further alleged that she fell on the ground after getting injured. Other allegations are against other accused persons.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61825 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2

¶17

offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is land dispute between the parties. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that the kudal blow did not hit the informant and from perusal of the order of the trial Court, it also transpires that the nature of injury which has been received by the informant is simple. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.06.2025.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the the application for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioner has assaulted with kudal .

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the nature of injury is simple, there is allegation of only one blow and there is land dispute between the parties, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1^st Class, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025.

¶20

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

lata/- U T

Rajeshwar Kumar @ Raju Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeshwar Kumar @ Raju Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar @ Joki Vs The State of Bihar

Ganpat Kumar @ Ganpat Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar @ Munna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Rai @ Bhola Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar