Allowed¶19

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Sept 2025CR. MISC./61806/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar, Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.61806 of 2025 (arising out of Rahika P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, District Madhubani), oral order dated 09-09-2025 by Ashok Kumar Pandey, J. Regular bail granted under sections 8, 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act; prosecution alleged 2.52 kg ganja recovered from the house of the petitioner's father; counsel argued quantity less than commercial; petitioner in custody since 04.05.2025; bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Madhubani. ¶19

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61806 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah S/O Upendra Sah R/O Kakraul, P.S- Rahika, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ugresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 09-09-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8, 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶14

The case of the prosecution is that from the house of Upendra Sah the father of the petitioner, altogether, 2.52 kg of ganja was recovered.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that two accused persons, namely, the petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61806 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/2

¶17

and one Laxman Sah have been charged with the offences under Section N.D.P.S. Act. It has been submitted that the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 04.05.2025.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rahika P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Madhubani.

¶20

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

Shubham/-

¶22

U T

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Kumar @ Munna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeshwar Kumar @ Raju Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Rai @ Bhola Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Badhai Vs The State of Bihar

Bachcha Sah @ Bachcha Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Hridayashankar Singh @ Hridaya Shankar Singh Vs The State of Bihar