Rabish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar Shrivastava Vs The State of Bihar

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

8 09-04-2025

¶13

Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar Mishra, learned counsel

¶14

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 555 of 2021 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per the allegation made in the FIR, informant has purchased land from the petitioner and his mother on 24.06.2009 vide registered sale deed for Rs.2,75,000/-. After the said transaction, when the informant went for possession of the said land, on the spot one Dharamnath came and stopped her.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51368 of 2024(8) dt.09-04-2025 2/3

¶18

The informant, in such circumstances, lodged an FIR that she has been cheated by the petitioner and other co-accused.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informed that the petitioner has returned the entire amount, over and above a sum of Rs.2,75,000/-, which was the consideration value for the sale of land in question. On this ground, learned counsel submitted that the petitioner, once the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.4,25,000/-, then no case is made against the petitioner. The allegation is civil in nature. On these grounds the petitioner seeks to be released on bail.

¶20

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶21

Having perused the allegation made in the FIR and submission made on behalf of the parties, I find that the allegation leveled against the petitioner in the FIR is purely civil in nature. Instead of cancellation of sale deed, the consideration amount has been returned back by the petitioner. The informant, who was noticed through Whatsapp and both by ordinary process, as also by registered post with A/D and also having been informed personally by the petitioner, has neither represented by her counsel nor has appeared in person. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie , made out a case to

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51368 of 2024(8) dt.09-04-2025 3/3

¶23

be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶24

The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Ara Bhojpur in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 555 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶26

Ashishsingh/-

¶27

U T

Rabish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rabish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Nipu Sharma Vs Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University

Rajeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar Singh @ Vikram Pratap Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Verma Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Singh @ Umesh Kumar Yadav And Another Vs The State of Bihar