Allowed¶21

Balram Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Feb 2025CR. MISC./4273/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail allowed; offence under section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; Bhaptiahi P.S. Case No. 264 of 2024, Supaul; 567 liters Nepali-made illegal liquor recovered from tractor; petitioner claimed to be driver with no criminal antecedent; judicial custody since 18.11.2024; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties; Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.01, Supaul; Patna High Court; decided 11-02-2025.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 264 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.01, Supaul. ¶21

Balram Mehta Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4273 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2024 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Balram Mehta Son of Late Dhuthar Mehta Resident of Village- Garhia Gadhiya, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 11-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that from a tractor altogether 567 liters of nepali made illegal liquor was recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is the driver of the said vehicle and he has got no concern with the seized liquor. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4273 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2

¶18

languishing in judicial custody since 18.11.2024.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed

¶20

the prayer of regular bail.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 264 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.01, Supaul.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Shubham/-

¶24

U T

Balram Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balram Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar @ Bachcha Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Kuha Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sadanand Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bijuli Singh @ Vijali Singh Vs The State of Bihar