Allowed

Masid Khan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 May 2025CR. MISC./27200/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court considered a bail application in a case involving offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Arms Act. Relying on the lack of specific allegations against the petitioners and the fact that similarly situated co-accused had been granted bail, the court allowed the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount.

Masid Khan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27200 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2024 Thana- GWALPARA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Masid Khan S/o Hasim Khan, Resident of village- Jotmanohar, ward no.14, P.S.- Gwalpara, District- Madhepura

¶5

Guddu Khan S/o Hasim Khan, R/o vill - Jotmanohar, ward no. 14, P.S.Gwalpara, Distt.- Madhepura

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-05-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶15

A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024 dated 20.09.2024, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 Arms Act.

¶17

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 18.09.2024, the informant’s husband, Md. Farooque went to visit his paddy filed and orchard while she was also out for a morning walk. As he reached the field, co-accused Meer Azad, Feku Khan, Samim Alak @ Fulo Khan and Salauddin armed with country made pistols, opened fire on him. It is alleged that bullets fired by Meer Azad and Samim Alam @ Fulo Khan hit his rib cage and upper body

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27200 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/3

¶19

while bullets fired by Fenku Khan and Salauddin Khan missed him. As a result, he succumbed to his injuries and died on the spot. As per the written report, the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners conspired to murder the informant’s husband, Md. Farooque.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that F.I.R. has been lodged against 23 named accused persons including the petitioners. There is specific allegation against four named accused persons, namely, Meer Azad, Fenku Khan, Samim Alam @ Fulo Khan and Salauddin Khan. Specific allegation of gun shot is against Meer Azad and Samim Alam @ Fulo Khan due to which the husband of the informant received bullet injury. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners rather the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Meer Akhtar, Jarina Khatoon, Md Babul Khan @ Babul Khan, Sultan Khan have been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 12655 of 2025, 13674 of 2025 and 15489 of 2025 respectively. It is also submitted that Shagufta Praveen and Mister Khan @ Md. Minsar @ Minister Khan have been granted regular

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27200 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 3/3

¶22

bail vide order dated 19.04.2025 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6623 of 2025 and 14550 of 2025 respectively. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner no. 1 has two criminal cases against him and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal case against him. Petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2024. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶23

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶24

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J. M. 1^st Class, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024.

¶25

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶26

premchand/-

¶27

U T

Masid Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Masid Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wakil Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Thakur @ Vijay Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Awadh Kishore Mahto and Ors. Vs Fali Mahto and Ors.

Md. Gulshabir Vs The State of Bihar

Sambhu Kumar @ Sambhu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar