Dismissed¶¶16

Md Nadeem Akhatar @ Naddim v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Nov 2025CR. MISC./21090/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.21090 of 2025, decided 19-11-2025 by Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J. Anticipatory bail application rejected in a kidnapping case arising from Adapur P.S. Case No. 353 of 2024 (East Champaran) under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) B.N.S. / Sections 363, 366A, 34 IPC; informant's minor daughter allegedly kidnapped on pretext of marriage; victim untraceable despite police initiatives; defence pleas of delay in FIR, C.D.R. contact, school certificates showing majority, and parental contact not accepted.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances — including that the victim is still traceless and, according to the allegation, was kidnapped by the petitioner — the petitioner is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail, and the prayer is rejected. ¶¶16

Md Nadeem Akhatar @ Naddim Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21090 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2024 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md Nadeem Akhatar @ Naddim Son of Shiekh Phool Mohammad R/V -Andhara Ramgadhwa PS -Adapur Dist- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

The State of Bihar bihar	Versus
===================	... ... Opposite Party/s ==================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Adv. Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ==================================
CORAM: HONOURABL PANDEY	E MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

11 19-11-2025

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶9

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Adapur P.S. Case No. 353 of 2024 registered under Sections-137(2), 96, 3(5) of B.N.S. (corresponding to Sections-363, 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code).

¶10

Allegedly, the informant’s minor daughter was kidnapped by the petitioner on the pretext of marriage.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. There is delay of nine days in instituting the case and explanation for delay has not been explained by the prosecution. The daughter of the informant has left house with her own sweet will. According to C.D.R. report, the

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21090 of 2025(11) dt.19-11-2025 2/2

¶13

victim has been in touch with two mobile Numbers, i.e. 8104451779 (belongs to the petitioner) and the other 9819479746 which belongs to one Samir Alam. He has also submitted that according to school certificates, the victim is above 20 years of age and as per her own sweet will, she went with the petitioner. He has also submitted that as per instruction, the victim is in continuous touch of her parents on mobile phone.

¶14

On the otherhand, the learned counsel for the informant as well as Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that as per direction of this court, initiatives were taken by the police officials but the victim could not be traced out. It has also been submitted that the plea of the petitioner that the victim is in contact of her parents is also not revealed in the investigation.

¶15

The victim is still traceless. According to allegation, the petitioner has kidnapped her.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled for privilege of anticipatory bail and accordingly, the same is rejected .

¶17

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Md Nadeem Akhatar @ Naddim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md Nadeem Akhatar @ Naddim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laloo Chaupal @ Lalo Chaupal Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Singh @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Rambabu Paswan @ Sahdeo Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Dev Narain Rai Vs The State of Bihar