Allowed¶21

Fadar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Feb 2025CR. MISC./11018/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Typographical correction of police station name (Bihiya corrected to Shahpur) in petitioner's address in order dated 03.10.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 67777 of 2024; cost of Rs. 200/- deposited; surrender period extended by four weeks from 21-02-2025; Patna High Court, Rajiv Roy, J.; arises out of PS Case No. 270 of 2024, Thana SAHPUR, District Bhojpur; petitioner Fadar Paswan versus The State of Bihar.

What did the court decide?

Correction of the police station name from Bihiya to Shahpur in the petitioner's address in the order dated 03.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67777 of 2024, upon deposit of Rs. 200/- as cost, together with extension of the period of surrender to the next four weeks from 21-02-2025. ¶21

Fadar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11018 of 2025

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67777 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2024 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Fadar Paswan S/o Sir Niwash Paswan R/o Village- Sahjauli Dera, Police Station- Shahpur, Distt.- Bhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 21-02-2025 Heard the parties.

¶16

The present petition has been preferred :-

¶17

“for modification for correction of name of Police Station Shahpur in the place of Police Station Bihiya in Address of petition of order dated 03.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67777 of 2024 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy. In aforesaid order due to typographical minor mistake mentioned in ad-dress part of petitioner in main petition wrongly mention as Police Station Case Bihiya instead of Police Station Case Shahpur, that is not deliberately on the part of counsel for the petitioner and also further direction for extension

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11018 of 2025(2) dt.21-02-2025 2/2

¶19

of time.

¶20

On 03.10.2024, the relief was granted to the petitioner but inadvertently, in the party position the Police Station has been recorded as Bihiya which should have been Shahpur.

¶21

Considering the facts, it was a typographical error on the part of the petitioner for which a cost of Rs.200/- has been deposited by the petitioner. The necessary correction has been allowed.

¶22

The period of surrender is extended to next four weeks from today.

¶23

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶24

sharun/-

¶25

U T

Fadar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fadar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramakant Tiwari @ Ramakant Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Digvijay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Laltu Mukhia @ Laltu Kumar Mukhia Vs The State of Bihar

Harilal Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ruksana Khatoon @ Shiwani Vs The State of Bihar