Informant's appeal against acquittal of accused in a 2004 Bakhtiyarpur PS case; court granted three weeks to cure filing defects, failing which the appeal stands rejected.
Three weeks granted to remove office defects; appeal to stand rejected if not complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.253 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2004 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Ramesh Kumar
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, Spl. PP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 20-02-2025 Heard the parties.
“under first proviso of section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure is being filed by the Informant Ramesh Kumar being aggrieved by the judgment dated 26.00.24 passed by the Additional District & Session Judge-III, Barh in session trial no. 888 of 2008 arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 143 of 2004 by which the leamed court was pleased to acquit the respondent no.2 and 3 from the charges under sections 147, 148,149, 307,323, 324, 379, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.”
remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office failing which
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.253 of 2025(3) dt.20-02-2025 2/2
the appeal shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
sharun/-
U T
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ramesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
