Dismissed¶¶22

Sonu Ali v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jul 2025CR. MISC./10572/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sonu Ali v. The State of Bihar & Chandtara Khatoon | Patna HC CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10572 of 2025 | decided 18-07-2025 | Judge: Rajiv Roy | anticipatory bail rejected | IPC Ss. 406, 498(A) | Complaint Case No. 482 of 2022, Trial No. 3892 of 2022, PS Case No. 482/2022, Siwan | matrimonial cruelty / assault for want of motorcycle / wife ousted with minor child | mediation referral 12.05.2025 failed (both sides absent) | petitioner told to seek bail.

What did the court decide?

Taking into account the allegation that the petitioner thrashed the complainant in an inebriated state for want of a motorcycle and that she was ultimately forced to leave the marital home alongwith her minor child, the Court considered it appropriate that he seek bail rather than receive pre-arrest protection. ¶¶21

Sonu Ali Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10572 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2022 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSiwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sonu Ali S/o- Momtaz Alam Resident Of Village- Hussainganj, Ps- M H Nagar Hussainganj, Dist- Siwan

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Chandtara Khatoon W/o- Sonu Ali, D/o- Late Ahle Mian VillageMahoddipur Mohiuddinpur Ps- Siwan Muffasil Dist- Siwan

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Ms. Shyama Rani, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 18-07-2025

¶14

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for

¶15

the petitioner and Ms. Shyama Rani, learned counsel for the informant beside the learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 482 of 2022 (Trial No. 3892 of 2022) instituted under Sections 406, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution story, the complainant alleged that her marriage was solemnized in the year 2016 and according to Muslim Law but for want of a motorcycle, she was regularly assaulted and in the year 2022 thrown out of the home which followed the case.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10572 of 2025(4) dt.18-07-2025 2/2

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such demand was made, the lady is cruel and they wanted to settle the matter.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions, earlier the matter was sent to the Mediation Centre on 12.05.2025. The report has come and according to which, neither the petitioner nor the complainant appeared before the Mediation Centre.

¶21

Considering the allegation that has come against the petitioner of having thrashed the lady in an inebriated state for want of motorcycle and ultimately she was forced to leave home alongwith her minor child, in that background, it would be appropriate that he seek bail.

¶22

The anticipatory bail stands rejected.

¶23

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶24

Ravi/-

¶25

Sonu Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Saw, Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anwari Begum Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar