Appeal challenging cognizance taken under IPC and SC/ST Act sections in an SC/ST PS case was withdrawn by the appellants' counsel to pursue other remedies; the High Court dismissed the appeal and interlocutory application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.743 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2017 Thana- SC/ST District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
Heard the parties.
2. The present Memo of Appeal has been preferred for quashing the order dated 24.11.2017 by which the learned Special Judge cum Addl. Sessions Judge 1", Lakhisaral was pleased to take cognizance under Sections 341, 448, 323, 504, 506/34 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r) (2) (VA) of SC/St Act, against these appellants in Lakhisarai SC/ST P.S. Case No. 10/2017,
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.743 of 2024(6) dt.13-02-2025 2/2
computer (SC/ST) Registration No. 21/2017, Sl.
No. 85/17.
appellants prays that he for the present wants to withdraw the petition to take the remedial measure.
Interlocutory Application stand dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh
Mamta Kumari
Pampam Kumar @ Pampam Kumar Singh
Brajesh Saw @ Bablu Sao
The State of Bihar
Basudeo Das
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
