Om Prakash Choubey Vs the State of Bihar

Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondentState and learned counsel appearing for the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.

¶20

This appeal has been filed for setting aside the order dated 07.11.2023 passed by Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.319 of 2024(6) dt.04-12-2025 2/4

¶22

Atrocities) Act, Kaimur at Bhabhua in A.B.P. No. 1359/2023, arising out of Durgawati P.S. Case No. 293/2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 341, 342, 376, 328, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3(1)(r) (s)(iv) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of this appellants has been rejected.

¶23

In the F.I.R., the informant has alleged that on 30.06.2023 Yash Choubey forcibly took her daughter on a motorcycle and made physical relation with her and thereafter he took her daughter to Gujarat and used to establish physical relation with her daughter regularly. Yash Choubey also made video of physical relation and threatened to get the video viral. When the informant went to the house of accused Yash Choubey, the appellants abused her and taking caste name threatened her.

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Specific allegation of commission of rape is against coaccused Yash Choubey who is already in custody. Petitioner No. 1 is father, Petitioner No. 2 is mother and Petitioner No. 3 is brother of the accused Yash Choubey. No specific allegation of

¶25

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.319 of 2024(6) dt.04-12-2025 3/4

¶26

assault is there against the appellants. It is further submitted that the allegation does not come within the purview of the provisions of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act because there is no allegation that the same has been committed at public place. Appellants claim clean antecedent.

¶27

Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 vehemently opposed the appeal.

¶28

However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the impugned order order dated 07.11.2023 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Kaimur at Bhabhua in A.B.P. No. 1359/2023, arising out of Durgawati P.S. Case No. 293/2023 is, hereby, set aside and this criminal appeal is allowed.

¶29

In the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named appellants be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with

¶30

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.319 of 2024(6) dt.04-12-2025 4/4

¶31

Durgawati P.S. Case No. 293/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶32

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶33

P.K.P./-

¶34

U

Om Prakash Choubey v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Choubey v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranveer Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Ray @ Suresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kabindra Kumar @ Raju @ Rajeev Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Uday Shankar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Surajbhan @ Surajbhan Singh Vs The State of Bihar