Disposed

Md. Ataur Rahman @ Ataur Rahman @ Gore Miyan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Apr 2025CR. APP (SJ)/290/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against bail conditions imposed by the SC/ST Special Court, Vaishali, in a caste-atrocities case. Appellants undertook not to interfere with the informant's land pending civil proceedings but objected to restoring or repairing her hut. Court clarified the hut obligation arises only on a competent court's order and disposed of the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Md. Ataur Rahman @ Ataur Rahman @ Gore Miyan Vs The State of… — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.290 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Ataur Rahman @ Ataur Rahman @ Gore Miyan S/o Md. Navi Hussain @ Nabi Hasan R/o vill - Kaithulia, P.O. - Chandpura, ward no. 13, P.S. - Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali

¶5

Md. Zeaur Rahman @ Chunnu Mian @ Chunnu Miyan S/o Md. Navi Hussain @ Nabi Hasan R/o vill - Kaithulia, P.O. - Chandpura, ward no. 13, P.S. - Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali

¶6

... ... Appellant/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Sulochna Devi W/o Ramparvesh Paswan R/o vill - Kaithulia, P.OChandpura, ward no. 13, P.s. - Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

5 09-04-2025 Heard the parties.

¶18

The present appeal has been preferred:

¶19

“against the order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the learned Court of the Exclusive Special Court (SC/ST Act), Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 569/2024, filed under Section 115(2), 126(2), 74, 333, 76, 352 of BNS2023 and Sections 3(i)(r)(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2) (va) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, whereby the appellants' prayer for regular bail was provisionally allowed, subject to certain

¶20

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.290 of 2025(5) dt.09-04-2025 2/4

¶21

conditions, including the impugned condition: "The accused shall not interfere, till any order of Competent Court, in 2 decimal parcha land of informant regarding land plot no. 125 as mentioned in order dated 22.12.2023 passed by Learned Additional District Magistrate, Vaishali in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 81/2020-21 and also the accused shall restore or repair the hut of informant if required. The appellants respectfully prays that the said condition is unrelated to the criminal allegations and pertains to a civil dispute under the jurisdiction of the Competent Civil Court. The condition imposes unwarranted obligations beyond the scope of a bail order, causing undue prejudice to the appellants' legal rights. The appellants pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to modify or set aside the impugned condition and grant any other relief(s) as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the appellants submit that abiding by the condition of the court, they shall not be

¶23

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.290 of 2025(5) dt.09-04-2025 3/4

¶24

interfering with the land in question (2 Decimal Parcha land) of the informant at land Plot No. 125 as mentioned in the order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Magitrate, Vaishali in Jamabandi cancellation Case No. 81/2020-2021, till an order of the competent court and failure to do so, the court concerned shall be free to cancel the bail bond.

¶25

However, as the Civil Suit is pending, they should not be compelled to either restore or repair the hut of the informant.

¶26

Learned Special PP Mr. Sadanand Paswan has taken this Court to condition no.2 of the learned court dated 27.09.2024 which read as follows:

¶27

(2) The accused shall not interfere, till any order of Competent Court, in 2 decimal purcha land of informant regarding land plot no. 125 as mentioned in order dated 22.12.02023 passed by Ld. A.D.M. Vaishali in Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 81/2020-21 and also the accused shall restore or prepare the hut of informant on that plot if required.

¶28

He further submits that the court has not directed straight away to restore or repair the hut rather it has opined that

¶29

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.290 of 2025(5) dt.09-04-2025 4/4

¶30

if required, which means that only after an order is passed by a competent court, the appellants may be required to restore/repair

¶31

the hut.

¶32

Learned counsel for the appellants reiterate that neither they nor their family members will be going nearby to the said land as recorded above.

¶33

Expecting the appellants to abide by the conditions which has already been clarified in the present order, the Appeal stands disposed of.

¶34

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶35

vinayak/-

¶36

U T

Md. Ataur Rahman @ Ataur Rahman @ Gore Miyan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Md. Ataur Rahman @ Ataur Rahman @ Gore Miyan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Samsul Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Ray @ Suresh Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pappan Kumar Singh @ Baban Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar