Writ petition against State of Bihar and Chapra Nagar Nigam officials; counsel submitted the petitioner's grievance stood redressed during pendency and the petition was not pressed. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8215 of 2023
======================================================
Haidar Ali, S/o Late Farad Hussain, R/o Mohalla-Masumganj, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District-Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA-3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6 01-02-2024 Heard the parties.
for the petitioner, submits at the Bar that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and, as such, he is not pressing the writ petition.
(Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/- U
Haidar Ali
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development & Housing Department, Bihar, Patna
The Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna
The Director, Municipality Administration-cum-Additional Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Bihar, Patna
The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Saran
The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
