Disposed

Anjali Banerjee v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Feb 2024CWJC/2518/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a superannuated teacher for unpaid salary arrears and retiral dues. The State sanctioned Rs. 18,92,374/- towards arrears and undertook payment. Court disposed of the petition directing payment of all admissible retiral benefits within eight weeks, failing which interest at 8% would be payable.

What did the court decide?

Direction to pay all admissible retiral benefits/dues within eight weeks; default attracts 8% interest on delayed payment.

Anjali Banerjee Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2518 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anjali Banerjee, Daughter of Late Hirendra Nath Banerjee, Resident of at General Hat, Ward No. 15, P.O. and P.S. Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna.

¶8

¶9

¶10

The District Education Officer, Madhepura.

¶11

The District Programme Officer (Secondary), Madhepura.

¶12

The In-Charge Headmaster, Vijaya Smarak Project Girls High School, Alamnagar, P.O. and P.S. - Alamnagar, District - Madhepura.

¶13

The Accountant General Bihar, Beerchand Patel Path, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv. Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-1, SC-13 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶17

9 01-02-2024

¶18

Heard Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, learned counsel for

¶19

the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the State.

¶20

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhepura is also present.

¶21

The petitioner by invoking the prerogative writ jurisdiction of this Court, has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to ensure payment of all the pre-retiral dues, including the arrears of salary which remain unpaid and also post-retiral dues,

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.2518 of 2021(9) dt.01-02-2024 2/3

¶23

including Pension, Gratuity, Provident Fund, L.I.C. and other emoluments.

¶24

It is submitted on behalf of the respondent State Authorities that pursuant to the letter issued by the District Education Officer, Madhepura, the In-charge Headmaster, Vijay Smark Project Kanya Uchch Vidyalay has submitted the necessary documents, on the basis of which, approval has been made for payment of salary etc. from 09.02.1991 to December, 2018. Thereafter, for the payment of arrears, calculation of salary of the petitioner from January, 1991 till December 2012 has been made and the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Madhepura has granted sanction for payment of amount to the tune of Rs. 18,92,374/- and the same has been communicated to the Treasury Officer, Madhepura for payment.

¶25

In compliance with the direction of this Court, the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Madhepura is present in the Court and he undertakes that the aforesaid payment shall be made within a period of two weeks. He further submits that the entire admissible retiral benefit(s) shall also be accorded to the petitioner, preferably within a period of eight weeks.

¶26

In view of the undertaking given before this Court,

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.2518 of 2021(9) dt.01-02-2024 3/3

¶28

the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to ensure payment of all the admissible retiral benefit(s)/ other dues of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶29

Needless to observe that the petitioner superannuated on 31.10.2019 and till date her claim has not been settled, any defiance of the undertaking given before this Court shall be dealt with sternly and, in case of failure, the erring official(s) shall be responsible to ensure interest @8% over the delayed payment.

¶30

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶31

rohit/-

¶32

Anjali Banerjee v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjali Banerjee v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harun Mian @ Haroon Miya Vs The State of Bihar

Prashant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Smt. Mahapunya Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Haidar Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Bishnupad Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar