Writ petitioner, a retired IA clerk, sought direction to retain his nominee in the pension payment order. Court disposed of petition directing respondent to consider claim under Apex Court order in Smt. Shiramabai case.
Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's claim under the Apex Court order in Civil Appeal No. 5262 of 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3574 of 2023
======================================================
Bishnupad Tiwari Son of Late Ram Charitar Tiwari, Resident of VillageSujanpur, P.O. Shankarpuri Badiha, P.S. Indrapuri, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dudh Nath Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, Ac to SC-11 For the A.G. : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 01-02-2024
Heard Mr. Dudh Nath Singh, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the State. Raj Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar is also present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3574 of 2023(3) dt.01-02-2024 2/3
has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to retain the name of his nominee, namely Smt. Kumari Vidyadhari Sandil in pension payment order dated 14.01.2011 for family pension in the event of death of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3574 of 2023(3) dt.01-02-2024 3/3
terms of the afore-noted order passed in Civil Appeal No. 5262 of 2023.
(Harish Kumar, J)
supratim/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to retain the nominee's name in the pension payment order given the delay in filing the petition.
In what terms should the claim of the petitioner be considered vis-a-vis the Apex Court order in Smt. Shiramabai.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Shiramabai vs. The Captain, Record OfficerFollowed¶22
Civil Appeal No. 5262 of 2023 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 29319 of 2019
Bishnupad Tiwari
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Division (Mechanical), Dehri, Rohtas
The Executive Engineer, (Mechanical), Dehri, Rohtas
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
