In a criminal miscellaneous application, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's bail plea in a case involving 21 kg of ganja recovery, citing the huge recovery as a reason not to grant bail at present.
Bail prayed for was not granted; application dismissed; trial directed to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75605 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya
======================================================
Deepak Pathak Son of Vijay Pathak R/o vill - Lahthan, P.S. - Agiaon, Distt. - Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 27-02-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75605 of 2023(3) dt.27-02-2024 2/2
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
grant bail to the petitioner for the present.
prayer for bail.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with offences under the NDPS Act involving a huge recovery.
Whether the violation of mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act entitles the petitioner to bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Pathak
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
