Dismissed

Md. Talib Khan @ Banti v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2024CR. MISC./74944/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous application for bail, the Patna High Court refused bail to the petitioner facing theft charges. With seven pending cases and CCTV evidence showing the petitioner at the scene, the court held that the prayer for bail is rejected and directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail stands rejected; direction to expedite trial given.

Md. Talib Khan @ Banti Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74944 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1065 Year-2022 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Talib Khan @ Banti Son Of Md. Firoj Alam @ Sharafat Khan Resident Of Training School Jafar Gali, P.S. - Sultanganj, Distt. - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 27-02-2024

¶13

Heard learned cousnel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Danapur P.S.Case No. 1065 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The theft was committed from the flat of the informant and the petitioner’s face has been captured in the CCTV footage. He was seen leaving the place after committing theft.

¶17

The petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2023. The petitioner has seven criminal cases pending against the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the materials available on the record

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74944 of 2023(3) dt.27-02-2024 2/2

¶20

and the antecedents of the petitioner , I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present, accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

¶21

The Trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same and if his trial is delayed the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

¶22

With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

¶23

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna through FAX or e-mail forthwith for its compliance.

¶24

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶25

N.K/-

¶26

U T

Md. Talib Khan @ Banti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Talib Khan @ Banti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aaditya Alok Vs The State of Bihar

Bindeshwar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Pathak Vs the State of Bihar

Aman Kumar @ Rahul Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu Ranjan @ Chhotu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar