Second regular bail application in a murder case of indiscriminate firing where no specific role was assigned to the petitioner. The court dismissed the application but permitted renewal if trial progress is insufficient.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6742 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2019 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda
======================================================
Jindal Ravidas @ Jitendra Son of Satyanam Ravidas @ Satpal Ravidas R/o vill - Ashanagar, P.S. - Sohsarai, Distt. - Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satya Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 16-02-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6742 of 2024(2) dt.16-02-2024 2/2
specific role has been assigned to a particular person in a case of
firing.
is no sufficient progress in the trial.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in S.T. No. 485 of 2022 arising out of Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 259 of 2019.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jindal Ravidas @ Jitendra
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
