Petitioner applied for bail in connection with Section 392 IPC charges and six other serious cases. Being already in custody and having previous rejected bail applications, the court refused to review the earlier order and dismissed the bail application while directing expedited trial.
Bail application dismissed; trial directed to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5949 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2023 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Guddu Sahani Son of late Birendra Sahani Resident of Village- Siswa Agagari, P.S.-Banjariya, Distt.-East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjana Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 16-02-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5949 of 2024(2) dt.16-02-2024 2/2
my earlier order.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is accused of offences under Section 392 IPC and is already in custody.
Whether the trial of all cases registered against the petitioner shall be expedited.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Guddu Sahani
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
