Dismissed

Md. Israfil v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Feb 2024CR. MISC./6710/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application of petitioner detained for alleged participation in the killing of two persons including a child, with blood found on his clothes during investigation. Finding no ground to review his earlier rejecting order, the judge again dismissed the application and directed the trial be expedited.

What did the court decide?

None granted; bail refused again, court below directed to expedite trial.

Md. Israfil Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6710 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2022 Thana- SHRI NAGAR District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Israfil S/O Md. Videshi Village- Pokharia, Ward No. 01, Ps.- Shri Nagar, Dist. Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-02-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

This is the second attempt for bail of the petitioner as earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 28.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 14299 of 2023.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shri Nagar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 28.07.2023, which reads as follows:

¶16

“Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shri Nagar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 302,

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6710 of 2024(2) dt.16-02-2024 2/3

¶19

201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

As per the prosecution case, Md. Sonu is the informant of the present case. He has filed F.I.R. saying that he he married his sister namely Murshida Khatoon with one Md. Jibrail. Md. Jibrail used to assault and torture his wife and his family members used to participate in the assault and torture. On 06.08.2022, the dead body of the Murshida Khatoon was recovered on the bridge and when the informant went to the house of Murshida Khatoon then he found that the head of the niece of the informant namely Jiya Khatoon aged about one and half year was there in the house and the head was found kept on the table. The police was informed and thereafter the investigation proceeded.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.08.2022, he is quite innocent and has not committed any offence.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed

¶23

the prayer for bail.

¶24

I have considered the submissions of the parties.

¶25

During investigation, Md. Israil was arrested by the F.S.L. team and blood was found on his clothes.

¶26

Two persons have been brutally killed. One of them was one and half year old girl. The petitioner is raid to have participated in the killing.

¶27

When two persons were killed in the house and the petitioner was staying in the same house, it was his duty along with other family members to inform the police if he is really innocent. None of the family members of the deceased including the accused persons have informed the police about the alleged crime.

¶28

In a case of such double murder, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶29

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

¶30

The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.”

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6710 of 2024(2) dt.16-02-2024 3/3

¶32

I find no ground to review my earlier order.

¶33

This application is dismissed again.

¶34

The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of

¶35

the petitioner.

¶36

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶37

P. Kumar

¶38

U T

Md. Israfil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Israfil v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Imtyaz Ahsan Vs The State of Bihar

Mamta Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jindal Ravidas @ Jitendra Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Shakeel Jat @ Shekeel Jat @ Md. Sakeel Jat Vs The State of Bihar