Regular bail application in a bank robbery case under Sections 395/412 IPC and Arms Act. Court noted recovery of looted amount, loaded pistol, cartridges and dagger from petitioner, prior criminal antecedent under Section 395 IPC, gravity of offence; bail prayer rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50572 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2022 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================
Amit Kumar SON OF RAMESH PASWAN Resident of village -bakharia, ps -majhauliya, dist -west champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL ORDER
2 20-07-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50572 of 2024(2) dt.20-07-2024 2/2
bail of the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Brajesh Kumar/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to a petitioner in custody since 26.08.2022 for alleged bank robbery under IPC Sections 395/412 and Arms Act offences.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Amit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
