Anticipatory bail sought in an excise case where 58.875 litres of foreign liquor was allegedly recovered from the petitioner's house and he fled during a raid. The court noted the recovery, seizure list, FIR naming him, and rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail.
None; prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46855 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
Md. Azad @ Md. Parvej Alam Son Of Mustafa Alam @ Md. Mustafa Alam Resident Of Village - Dholbazza, Ward No.22, Near Masjid, P.S. - Forbesganj, District - Araria - 854318 ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER
2 20-07-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46855 of 2024(2) dt.20-07-2024 2/2
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
saurabhkr/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for recovery of illicit liquor from his house.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Azad @ Md. Parvej Alam
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
