Nine petitioners sought anticipatory bail in Garkha PS Case No.695 of 2019 involving assault charges. The court found injuries to informant and another witness credible and noted criminal antecedents, rejecting anticipatory bail for all petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43909 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-695 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43909 of 2021(6) dt.12-02-2024 2/2
325, 504 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners facing arrest for offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 325, 504 IPC read with Section 27 Arms Act?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanoj Mahto
Raju Mahto
Madhu Mahto
Dilip Mahto
Gula Sah @ Bala Sah
Randhir Mahto
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
