Bail application for a petitioner detained in an NDPS case registered under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B). Court declined bail considering the nature of allegation and custody period, dismissed the application, and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
Bail denied; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9616 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2021 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Shibu Sahani @ Shibu Sahni @ Sibu Sahani S/O RABINDRA SAHANI @ RAVINDRA SAHNI VILLAGE- SURSAND, WARD NO. 7, PS. SURSAND, DIST. SITAMARHI.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
sanjeev/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in NDPS Case No. 32 of 2021 under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shibu Sahani @ Shibu Sahni @ Sibu Sahani S/O Rabindra Sahani @ Ravindra Sahani
The State of Bihar
The Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
