Allowed¶20

Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jul 2024CR. MISC./37394/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail renewal; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act section 30(a); Piri Bazar P.S. Case no. 128 of 2023, Lakhisarai; 16 litres liquor recovery from motorcycle; custody since 14.9.2023 exceeding six months; liberty in earlier rejection dated 18.1.2024 (Cr. Misc. no. 1184 of 2024); bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court-1st Class, Lakhisarai.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail in Piri Bazar P.S. Case no. 128 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court-1st Class, Lakhisarai. ¶20

Bikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37394 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2023 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bikash Kumar son of Pawan Yadav Village- Lahsorwa Ps- Piribazar DistLakhisari

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-07-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. Case no. 128 of 2023 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, 16 litres of liquor was recovered from the motorcycle being driven by the petitioner and the petitioner was taken into custody.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 18.1.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 1184 of 2024 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after completing six months in custody. The petitioner has remained

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37394 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 2/2

¶18

in custody for more than 6 months since 14.9.2023 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R, the liberty granted to the petitioner in the earlier order of rejection dated 18.1.2024 and the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 6 months since 14.9.2023, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. Case no. 128 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Special Excise Court-1st Class, Lakhisarai.

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶22

Harsh/-

Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Biglu Kr Paswan @ Biglu Kumar Paswan @ Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Tausif Vs the State of Bihar

Laltu Kumar Sharma @ Laltu Sharma @ Laltu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karishma Kumari @ Karishma Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Gulab Vs The State of Bihar