The court rejected the petitioner's application for regular bail in a case involving cheating and forgery allegations related to a Common Service Centre. The court relied on case diary statements indicating the petitioner operated the centre after the main accused absconded and was involved in misappropriation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36869 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-970 Year-2023 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
====================================================== Bittu Kumar SON OF BHARAT RAM R/O VILLAGE- AMHRA, P.S.AMHRA, DIST- Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajnish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 25-09-2024
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36869 of 2024(4) dt.25-09-2024 2/2
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in connection with offences under Sections 420, 379, 467 and 468 IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bittu Kumar
State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
