Mukul Singh @ Munnu @ Mukul Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite previous opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1878 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2023 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
MUKUL SINGH @ MUNNU @ MUKUL KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAMEKBAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- BATHNAHA, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTT. SITAMARHI
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
None appeared on behalf of the appellant on calls
even today, despite the last opportunity given to him, vide order 08.07.2024.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U T
MUKUL SINGH @ MUNNU @ MUKUL KUMAR SINGH
THE STATE OF BIHAR
RAM SUNAR DEVI
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court