Dismissed¶¶22

Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Apr 2024CR. MISC./24221/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.24221 of 2024, decided 29-04-2024 by Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya. Petitioner Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav sought bail apprehending arrest in Medeni Chouki P.S. Case No.122 of 2023, District Lakhisarai, under Sections 395 IPC (dacoity/looting of motorcycle BR09Q2394). Bail rejected on account of allegation of looting with co-accused and criminal antecedents in 04 cases (dacoity, Arms Act, Excise Act). Advocates: Rajive Ranjan Singh for petitioner; Sanjay Kumar Sharma for the State.

What did the court decide?

As it appears the petitioner, along with other co-accused persons, looted motorcycle bearing registration no.BR09Q2394, and as the petitioner has criminal antecedents of 04 cases of dacoity, Arms Act and Excise Act, the Court is not inclined to grant bail. ¶¶21

Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24221 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2023 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav Son of Valmiki Yadav Resident of Vill.-Abgil Rampur Husaini, P.S.-Medani Chauki, Distt.-Lakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 29-04-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf

¶14

of the parties.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Medeni Chouki P.S. Case No.122 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation against the petitioner along with other co-accused persons is to have looted a motorcycle of the informant.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that nothing incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24221 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2

¶19

petitioner during course of investigation, which may connect him with the present set of occurrence, where, petitioner was not present at the spot.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

In view of the submissions, as made above, as it appears from this petitioner along with other co-accused persons looted the motorcycle bearing registration no.BR09Q2394, which was parked in front of the gate and as petitioner has criminal antecedents of 04 cases of dacoity, arms act and excise act, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

¶23

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶24

S.Katyayan/-

¶25

U T

Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman Kumar @ Raman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Bilas @ Chhotu Kumar @ Ram Bilas Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @Ram Singar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar @ Rahish Yadav @ Rahish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Firoj Vs The State of Bihar

Vikramaditya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar