Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for offences under IPC Sections 326, 307/34 and Arms Act Section 27 after allegedly firing at the informant. Citing grievous firearm injuries, supporting witnesses and direct allegations in the FIR and case diary, the High Court declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22819 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2023 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Lal Babu Singh S/o Late Ram Dayal Singh R/O VILLAGE - HARIBELA, P.S.- BATHNAHA, DIST. - SITAMARHI
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL ORDER
2 29-04-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22819 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Brajesh Kumar/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner facing arrest for shooting and injuring the informant with a firearm.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lal Babu Singh
The State Of Bihar
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
