Petitioner submitted that the State complied with the Court's directions during the pendency of the writ petition, rendering it infructuous; the court accepted this and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5069 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17406 of 2017
======================================================
Vinod Kumar Kantha, Son of Late RSP Kantha, resident of UDAYAN Shakti Nagar, Anisabad, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akashdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Mr. Raghwanand, GA 11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
instruction, submitted that during pendency of the present MJC petition State has complied the direction of this Court, therefore,
Patna High Court MJC No.5069 of 2018(3) dt.30-10-2023 2/2
the present MJC petition has become infructuous.
of as it has become infructuous.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
( Arun Kumar Jha, J)
GAURAV S./-
U
Vinod Kumar Kantha
The State Of Bihar
Chaitanya Prasad
Ram Sewak
Manoj Prasad
Amrendra Prasad Singh
P. B. Bajanthri
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
