Dismissed

Chand Tara Khatun v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri S. Siddharth, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Industries, Gov

Patna HC10 Aug 2023MJC/4239/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition filed for compliance of an earlier writ order abated due to the death of the petitioner. Liberty was granted to the petitioner's heirs to file a fresh contempt petition if the respondents failed to address the grievance.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to heirs of the petitioner to file a fresh contempt petition if compliance fails.

Chand Tara Khatun Vs The State Of Bihar Through Sri S… — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4239 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3054 of 2009

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Chand Tara Khatun Wife of Late Md. Jan Ansari, Resident of Village- Bhapte, P.S.- Narkatiyaganj, District- West Champaran.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Bihar Through Sri S. Siddharth, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Industries, Gov

¶9

Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh, Director Industries, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Sri A.K. Singh, Director Handloom and Handicrafts, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, P

¶11

Sri Brij Nandan Prasad, The Managing Director, Handloo and Handicrafts Corporation, Udhyog Bhawan,

¶12

Dr. Nilopal Goswami, The Accountant General of Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna.

¶13

Sri Brajesh, District Provident Fund Officer, Patna.

¶14

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Advocate

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶18

4 10-08-2023 Heard the parties.

¶19

The present contempt petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 3.5.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3054 of 2009.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that the petitioner is no more, he may be given liberty to file a fresh contempt petition through his heirs.

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.4239 of 2018(4) dt.10-08-2023 2/2

¶22

Considering the fact that the petitioner is no more, liberty is granted to his heirs to file contempt petition, if the opposite parties has failed to address to the grievance as ordered by the writ Court.

¶23

The MJC No. 4239 of 2018 stands abated.

¶24

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶25

Ravi/-

¶26

Chand Tara Khatun v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri S. Siddharth, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Industries, Gov

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chand Tara Khatun v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri S. Siddharth, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Industries, Gov

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Sharma @ Surendra Thakur Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Inderpal Vs Union of India, Ncb, through Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit

Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sainik Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ranjit Kumar Choudhary and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Bihar, P